hasemgogo.blogg.se

1. BEST PC GAMES INTEL HD 4000 MOVIE
2. BEST PC GAMES INTEL HD 4000 DRIVERS
3. BEST PC GAMES INTEL HD 4000 CODE

While it couldn't best the discrete graphics solutions, at these levels of utilization, there's not much to be concerned about in normal usage.

BEST PC GAMES INTEL HD 4000 MOVIE

It improved most (about 25% better) when handling our more complex and higher bitrate H.264 encoded movie title. In terms of CPU utilization for our Blu-ray playback, the Intel HD Graphics 4000 saw its performance slightly improve over the Intel HD Graphics 3000. Video Decoding Performance - Blu-ray Playback

BEST PC GAMES INTEL HD 4000 DRIVERS

We can only hope that perhaps Intel's software engineers can squeeze more performance out of it with better drivers in the future, but the margin of difference against the competition is very wide. This implies that the DirectX 11 performance of the new Intel IGP has a long way to go to compete effectively. Lastly and most importantly, the HD Graphics 4000 was thoroughly outpaced by the AMD A8-3850's Radeon HD 6550D as the latter generated nearly double the frame rates!

BEST PC GAMES INTEL HD 4000 CODE

Needless to say, it was also beaten by the GeForce GT 220 (though this ran at DX10) and GeForce GT 440. Compared to the previous generation Intel HD 3000, it led by margins in the range of about 20% but the gap should actually be wider because the new IGP is using DX11, whereas the old one is running on the DX10 code path. The Intel HD Graphics 4000 was outpaced by the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 card as it trailed by a margin of about 22%. As such, the scores aren't exactly comparable. Take note that in this game, the results should be taken in with care - there's a mix of DX10 and DX11 capable GPUs for which the latter will run the game utilizing DX11 routines. What about DirectX 11? With the failure of Intel's new HD Graphics 4000 to run 3DMark 11, we jumped directly to a game supporting it - Battlefield Bad Company 2. So DirectX 10 performance is looking decent for Intel's third-generation HD Graphics engine. Not bad at all for integrated graphics coming from Intel. In this benchmarking test, the frame rates churned out by the on-die Intel HD Graphics 4000 was fairly impressive as it finally broke past the absolute minimum average of 30fps and delivered average frame rate of 37.27! This came up to be 11% better than the discrete GeForce GT 520 graphics card and up 91% improvement over the last generation Intel HD Graphics 3000!ĪMD's A8-3850's internal Radeon HD 6550D managed just over 40fps and thus it's only a tad better than the Intel HD Graphics 4000. Having seen the theoretical graphics performance numbers in 3DMark Vantage, it's time to follow-up with a DX10 gaming title with Far Cry 2 to find out how it really translates in an actual game. Given that the Intel Core i7-3770K has much better general compute performance, 3D Mark Vantage score for the Intel camp came a little ahead of the AMD processor. The Intel HD Graphics 4000 even bested AMD's Fusion concept based AMD A8-3850's results but that's only because 3DMark Vantage also factors in the CPU's capabilities in computing the overall score. Needless to say, the GeForce GT 440 was overpowering the rest, but at least it's good to see Intel HD Graphics 4000 faring reasonably and fulfilling low-end discrete graphics capabilities. Moving on to a more intensive DX10 benchmark with 3DMark Vantage, the Intel HD Graphics 4000 managed to beat the old NVIDIA GT 220 by a margin of about 15% and was nearly double the performance when pitted against Intel HD Graphics 3000! Even the discrete NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 was trailing by a shameful 50%.

The other graphics tests should prove to be more accurate of the GPU's capabilities. Take note that PCMark's gaming score doesn't really tax the graphics engine much and is still primarily a CPU dominant benchmark. Compared to the Intel HD Graphics 3000, the new Intel HD Graphics 4000 pulled ahead by margins in the range of roughly 15%. With the more powerful GeForce GT 440, it beat the Intel HD 4000 by a margin of about 23%. Against the older DX10 GeForce GT 220, it was just a hair behind it with a 4% differential. Performance and Conclusion Integrated Graphics Performanceįor the Gaming suite of the PCMark Vantage benchmark, Intel HD 4000's scores were stellar and pulled ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 by a marginal amount.